This is a great example of top-of-funnel marketing and is totally in line with what we’ve been saying about B2B display advertising. If I’m reading a trade journal article about display advertising, I might very well be interested in watching a webinar on retargeting.
And contrary to what many Display Ad Nay-sayers (we’ve all met them and suffered their withering, narrow-minded criticisms) might think, the ad itself is tasteful and unobtrusive. It serves as a supplement to the article, instead of trying to distract the reader from the content. That’s a key idea to keep in mind when running B2B display ads: don’t expect to “wow” the viewer into clicking your ad or absorbing your message. Offer a meaningful message in a professional context; offer something that a B2B buyer might actually find valuable in their search for products and services. Remember, the average B2B buyer is spending at least several thousand dollars, so they probably won’t be enticed in the same simplistic ways that Groupon entices you with cheeseburger & sushi ads.
I dug into the page code, and it looks like this ad was running on the Google Display Ad Network, perhaps on a straightforward contextual basis, meaning that it might show up when the page content includes very industry-specific terms like “display advertising” or “display ecosystem.”
Every local online ad sales team needs to have a fast, easy way to create ads for clients. It’s a really simple way to shorten their sales cycle and generate interest from prospects. Get the full story in 5 minutes (it’s narrated, so turn on your audio).
It’s a well-documented fact and challenge that average banner ad clickthrough rates are very low, somewhere around 0.09 percent (that’s just 9 clicks out of every 10,000 times an ad is shown).
A recent study sponsored by AdKeeper and 24/7 Real Media surveyed consumers and asked them why they don’t click on banner ads. The number one reason given: 61 percent don’t want to be distracted: “Online banner ads take me away from my current website, or from what I am doing.”
You could look at this research and conclude that people just hate all banner ads, therefore there’s no point in running banner campaigns. But such a conclusion would ignore a few key points:
1. If people don’t want to be distracted from their current web page, then put a lot of relevant content right in your banner ad. That way the viewer doesn’t have to click the ad in order to learn about your products/services. Canned Banners has all sorts of templates that allow you to include lots of product info. Here’s a good example of a template that can feature multiple products and descriptions:
2. A lot of banner ads look downright awful, which probably explains some poor performance. But this study doesn’t seem to have examined that aspect, aside from noting that “43 percent [of consumers] say online banner ads don’t seem interesting or engaging” (the concept “interesting and engaging” could have to do with multiple factors, including targeting, which is quite independent of how an ad looks). It seems to me that the study might have provided deeper insight into consumer behavior by passively observing people in test scenarios, rather than simply asking survey questions, which tend, by their very nature, to lead people to give certain answers. Such observations might reveal how the appearance of a banner ad (regardless of the product/service being advertised) affects its clickthrough rate. However, that probably would have been a much more expensive study to conduct.
3. Some banner ads get much higher clickthrough rates than 0.09%. Canned Banners’ own ad campaigns have done better than that. First, it’s important to target your ads intelligently. Understand who your customers are and then find them online by buying inventory on specific types of websites or targeting specific keywords. Don’t just run your banner ads everywhere, because then it’s almost certain that you’ll get low clickthrough rates. Second, utilize tactics like site retargeting, search retargeting, and geo-targeting. These tactics will help you pinpoint your customers; as long as you’re showing them well-designed, relevant banner ads, you’ll probably see clickthrough rates significantly higher than a measly 0.09%.
I had a new editorial published today on Adotas.com. It’s a somewhat sarcastic look at the limited self-serve options that are available to small businesses if they want to break out of little Google text ads and start using banner ads that actually show their products in living color.
It was a struggle keeping the editorial down to about 900 words, so I’ll elaborate a bit further.
In the article, I suggest a few reasons that it’s challenging to offer self-serve banner advertising to SMBs:
They have low budgets, which reduces the amount of potential profit for ad networks, publishers, and everyone else in the ad stack.
It’s hard for SMBs to create display ads (that’s where Canned Banners comes in).
Flash ads are often problematic, so it’s near impossible for ad networks to deal with bugs from thousands upon thousands of SMB banner ads.
Here are some other reasons (related to the three above) that I think there isn’t more going on in the realm of SMB self-serve advertising:
Venture/angel funding—A large portion of ad networks and solution providers are venture-backed. This implies that their investors will want them to follow a business model that will earn a sufficient return on invested capital. Generating such returns is tough in the high-volume / low-margin SMB market, so these venture-backed firms tend to chase the big money: agencies, brand advertisers, and such. Does this mean that you can’t make a profit in the SMB world? Of course not. Think of the untold billions that Google has raked in from mom-and-pops running text-based search campaigns. But until the “big money” dries up, don’t expect too many venture-backed firms to start chasing after the little guy’s wallet.
An inefficient market for ad inventory—Why is it that anyone with a few dollars in the bank can go online and within a few minutes buy 0.22 shares of Google stock? That’s because the market for buying and selling stocks is highly efficient and liquid. Trades are automated, prices are publicly available and updated in real time, and deals happen in fractions of a second. This is not true of the market for banner ad space. If you want your ads to be seen by the right people in the right places at the right times, don’t be surprised if you end up having to run a dozen separate campaigns on different platforms. More and more ad inventory is being bought and sold in spot markets, but a lot of it is still bought and sold very inefficiently, where you have to fill out sales inquiry forms, pick up the phone and talk to someone, or meet minimum budget requirements. And the inventory that’s bought and sold on spot markets isn’t necessarily accessible to SMBs. And what is accessible may be remnant inventory or other low-quality crap.
The ad industry is too tech-happy—There seems to be a fairly dominant segment in the industry that thinks that math, technology, and data will finally “solve” advertising once and for all (Why does it work? How does it work? How can I get people interested in my products? Such questions have been pondered for eons…). Naturally math, data, and technology are a huge piece of online advertising innovation, but this over-emphasis strikes me as quixotic and naïve…sort of a search for the “Philosopher’s Stone” of online advertising that will enable those who unlock it to direct the wills of powerless consumers. What does this have to do with SMBs? Well, in order to develop effective, usable solutions for SMBs, you have to think like them. And SMBs don’t give a rat’s ass about “audience buying,” “data mining,” or “creative optimization.” SMBs just want something that’s easy, affordable, and effective. Whether it’s achieved with supercomputers or windshield flyers doesn’t really matter. But until the online ad industry starts talking to SMBs in a language they understand, banner advertising is going to remain an out-of-reach, complex-seeming ad strategy, which it isn’t.
I ran across a good article today on Internet Evolution. The author, Dan Cypra, details the top four banner advertising blunders. In summary, they are:
Hiding your company’s identity / logo
Being tacky, not classy
Not proof-reading your banner ad
Using way too much text
Of course Canned Banners helps you with all four of those problems. All of our banners have a prominent place for your company’s name and logo. Canned Banners templates are designed to be eye-catching but still tasteful and professional. If you happen to make a spelling error, it’s inexpensive to come back to Canned Banners, find your saved banner ads, and fix them. Finally, our templates limit the amount of text you can fit into a single ad (the old saying “less is more” definitely applies here).
We recently crunched some numbers to estimate how much small businesses spend on banner advertising. The results of our analysis are in this handsome poster (PDF), and the source data is here (XLS). More to come on this later. Just wanted to make this content was available to anyone who happens to stop by our blog…
Seems like if the ad networks relied on services like Canned Banners, they wouldn’t have to worry about malicious ad files, since every SWF file coming from Canned Banners would be completely standard and contain not a trace of malicious code. There’s no way to introduce malicious code via Canned Banners, so any SWF file coming from Canned Banners can be deemed completely “clean.” A few weeks ago I wrote a detailed post (with pictures!) explaining this.
Just ran across this peach of a blog. It’s Cogblog, the blog of Cogmap.com. Essentially looks at the industry dynamics from an economic perspective, which appeals greatly to me. If you’re in the online ad industry and you enjoy reading thoughts that are more than just regurgitated buzzwords, check it out.
B2B display ad spotted in the wild
Just ran across a great example of B2B display advertising. It’s an ad from Acquisio promoting a webinar. The ad appeared alongside a very relevant article on SearchEngineLand.


This is a great example of top-of-funnel marketing and is totally in line with what we’ve been saying about B2B display advertising. If I’m reading a trade journal article about display advertising, I might very well be interested in watching a webinar on retargeting.
And contrary to what many Display Ad Nay-sayers (we’ve all met them and suffered their withering, narrow-minded criticisms) might think, the ad itself is tasteful and unobtrusive. It serves as a supplement to the article, instead of trying to distract the reader from the content. That’s a key idea to keep in mind when running B2B display ads: don’t expect to “wow” the viewer into clicking your ad or absorbing your message. Offer a meaningful message in a professional context; offer something that a B2B buyer might actually find valuable in their search for products and services. Remember, the average B2B buyer is spending at least several thousand dollars, so they probably won’t be enticed in the same simplistic ways that Groupon entices you with cheeseburger & sushi ads.
I dug into the page code, and it looks like this ad was running on the Google Display Ad Network, perhaps on a straightforward contextual basis, meaning that it might show up when the page content includes very industry-specific terms like “display advertising” or “display ecosystem.”